<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why productivity is bunk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billbennett.co.nz/2008/10/07/why-productivity-is-bunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billbennett.co.nz/2008/10/07/why-productivity-is-bunk/</link>
	<description>knowledge workers - for people paid to think for a living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Gilkey</title>
		<link>http://billbennett.co.nz/2008/10/07/why-productivity-is-bunk/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billbennettnz.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Aye, the language is a bit unfortunate - hence my want to take it back from those who&#039;ve lost sight of what is productivity and what isn&#039;t.

If the Productivity Cult were honest enough to say they were just playing, then I wouldn&#039;t have a problem. I&#039;ll not say what should be entertaining and what shouldn&#039;t, for that&#039;s an aesthetic argument that&#039;s neither here nor there.

It&#039;s when the Cult tries to convince themselves and others that they&#039;re &quot;getting things done&quot; that we both get annoyed. Fine, enjoy playing...try out those new systems...buy new gadgets...but all the while notice that you&#039;re not pushing your real goals forward.

So we both see eye to eye on productivity, and we both are talking about real productivity. The Cult...well, they&#039;re not right. How&#039;s that for groupthink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye, the language is a bit unfortunate &#8211; hence my want to take it back from those who&#8217;ve lost sight of what is productivity and what isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>If the Productivity Cult were honest enough to say they were just playing, then I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem. I&#8217;ll not say what should be entertaining and what shouldn&#8217;t, for that&#8217;s an aesthetic argument that&#8217;s neither here nor there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s when the Cult tries to convince themselves and others that they&#8217;re &#8220;getting things done&#8221; that we both get annoyed. Fine, enjoy playing&#8230;try out those new systems&#8230;buy new gadgets&#8230;but all the while notice that you&#8217;re not pushing your real goals forward.</p>
<p>So we both see eye to eye on productivity, and we both are talking about real productivity. The Cult&#8230;well, they&#8217;re not right. How&#8217;s that for groupthink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billbennettnz</title>
		<link>http://billbennett.co.nz/2008/10/07/why-productivity-is-bunk/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>billbennettnz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billbennettnz.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I guess we&#039;re singing from the same page but we&#039;re a bit trapped by the language here.

Like you I&#039;m all for being efficient and organized with a clear set of priorities. It that&#039;s productive, then you and I are both into productivity.

My problem, and I think it&#039;s yours too, is with the cult of Productivity. I&#039;m worried that a lot of people see producitvity as an end rather than a means.

Reading some of the high profile productivity blogs gives me the impression that some people view playing with productivity tools as a form of entertainment. Now that&#039;s just crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we&#8217;re singing from the same page but we&#8217;re a bit trapped by the language here.</p>
<p>Like you I&#8217;m all for being efficient and organized with a clear set of priorities. It that&#8217;s productive, then you and I are both into productivity.</p>
<p>My problem, and I think it&#8217;s yours too, is with the cult of Productivity. I&#8217;m worried that a lot of people see producitvity as an end rather than a means.</p>
<p>Reading some of the high profile productivity blogs gives me the impression that some people view playing with productivity tools as a form of entertainment. Now that&#8217;s just crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgilkey1</title>
		<link>http://billbennett.co.nz/2008/10/07/why-productivity-is-bunk/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>cgilkey1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billbennettnz.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-52</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re mostly right that I&#039;m only part way into the recovery process. But I also wonder what&#039;s inherently wrong with &quot;productivity tips.&quot;

If we focus solely on hacks and such, then I agree - let&#039;s move on. However, if the &quot;productivity tips&quot; are solving problems people are actually having, or helps them do the things they need to be doing or helps them stop doing what they don&#039;t need to be doing, then I suppose I&#039;ll have to bite the bullet and say that I&#039;m still giving productivity tips.

The way I currently see productivity lends me to think that what you&#039;re doing here is giving productivity tips. I like what you&#039;re doing, too, but should we be suspicious because they are productivity tips?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re mostly right that I&#8217;m only part way into the recovery process. But I also wonder what&#8217;s inherently wrong with &#8220;productivity tips.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we focus solely on hacks and such, then I agree &#8211; let&#8217;s move on. However, if the &#8220;productivity tips&#8221; are solving problems people are actually having, or helps them do the things they need to be doing or helps them stop doing what they don&#8217;t need to be doing, then I suppose I&#8217;ll have to bite the bullet and say that I&#8217;m still giving productivity tips.</p>
<p>The way I currently see productivity lends me to think that what you&#8217;re doing here is giving productivity tips. I like what you&#8217;re doing, too, but should we be suspicious because they are productivity tips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
