More on Twitter as journalism

A month ago I had a short but interesting online conversation with Australian journalist Renai LeMay who says Twitter is journalism. He has written a few posts on the subject on his blog and elsewhere. The best jumping off point for new readers is his Twitter’s impact on media and journalism.

LeMay is a visionary. For my money he has a great grasp of where news journalism and online media may go.

In my earlier post Can Twitter be journalism? I said I agree with him in principle. However, I believe only a fraction of Twittering journos use the technology as an interactive news media.

Most simply use Twitter as a broadcast medium – rather like an RSS feed. A number have Twitter accounts, but say little of real value. Perhaps 40 percent can be said to be serious Twitter journalists.

I may have been over optimistic with this estimate. Yesterday the Online Journalism Blog reported on how British newspapers use Twitter. In Newspapers on Twitter – how the Guardian, FT and Times are winning Malcolm Coles writes;

“newspapers have a total of 1,068,898 followers across their 120 official Twitter accounts – with the Guardian, Times and FT the only three papers in the top 10.”

This sounds encouraging. Buried further down the story is the comment:

“Out of 120 accounts, just 16 do something other than running as a glorified RSS feed. The other 114 do no retweeting, no replying to other tweets etc”

Coles also points out the newspaper sites do little in the way of following.

Cluetrain has barely stopped here

Both these points apply to the bulk of Twittering publications in Australian and New Zealand. My guess is journalists are encouraged by managers to promote their stories using the technology, but are actively discouraged from replying and retweeting.

There’s a precedent for this. After all, hardly any online publications in the region ever link to titles owned by other publishers – which means they are missing the point of online publishing somewhat. Until publishers encourage reporters and editors to engage with their audiences, they are going to miss out on the potential of Twitter.

Of course, the journalists who do really well at this will become media brands in their own right, which will worry the bean counters. But that’s another story…

2 thoughts on “More on Twitter as journalism

  1. I confess I am one who mainly uses Twitter as a glorified RSS feed using Tweetfeed. Mind you, it certainly works – one blog post was picked up in the Twittersphere (sorry) and gave me a huge (for me) traffic spike.

    I’ve posted about how journalists and the media love Twitter, mainly because it can give you the appearance of engaging with the digital media discussion without you having to do any work. But that’s really just using something like bit.ly to post quick links to Twitter. As you say, very few journalists use it for real reporting.

    One key thing for me is the effort involved. I find that long-form blogging simply takes up too much time and mental space. I’m just less inclined to spend time microblogging as well (and as well as my day job).

    Interesting that Paul Bradshaw of the Online Journalism Blog has noted he’s blogging less as he’s Twittering more.

  2. Pingback: New Zealand media people on Twitter at bill bennett : knowledge workers

Comments are closed.