Tuanz CEO Paul Brislen says Commerce Commission regulation artificially inflates VDSL prices and that’s one reason the broadband technology isn’t more widely used.
He makes a good point.
VDSL squeezes higher broadband speeds from cable networks than the ADSL2+ Chorus delivers to most of New Zealand through its network of roadside cabinets.
This makes VDSL a good interim technology while we wait for the UFB fibre to reach the suburbs. In particular, VDSL works well for video applications and, according to TrueNet would suit most small businesses, especially those in suburban homes.
Where I live, I see around 12 to 15Mbps down on my ADSL2+ connection. In theory I should get 1Mbps up, in practice I’ve never clocked uploads at that speed.
I’m 600 to 700m from the Chorus cabinet. With VDSL I may get double today’s down speed and see perhaps 10Mbps up.
As Brislen points out, VDSL2+ is expensive.
I pay $105 for a Telecom Total Home Broadband plan with 120GB of data. A VDSL2 plan with a similar amount of data costs around $160. There are gotchas with call prices and other aspects of the plans which will add to the cost. And I’d need to buy a new modem.
UFB fibre is due down my road – although maybe not past my house – in roughly two years from now. In round numbers a fibre plan with the same amount of data I enjoy today, but 100Mbps down, 30Mbps up will cost around $130.
All up, it would cost the thick end of $2000 to enjoy two years of being able to video-conference. That might just be worth the price if my colleagues and clients were keen to use video and were suitably equipped at their end. They’re not, so no VDSL for me.