Google says it is closing Google Reader because of declining use.
The company doesn’t make any money from its free web-based RSS reader, so its death doesn’t come as a surprise. After all, Google is a business not a charity.
For me it underlines what I previously wrote: sometimes free is too high a price.
Like thousands of other journalists I rely on Google Reader to check online news. It has been the best tool for that job for a long time. Twitter, Facebook and other social media tools simply don’t compare for this kind of work. RSS feeds are comprehensive lists, social media tends to give a fleeting snapshot.
There are other RSS tools, none of them work as well as Google Reader. It has the best interface for quickly scanning large numbers of posts, it has decent search tools built-in.
If Google started charging for Google Reader, I’d happily pay. It would be worth the fee.
There’s a disturbing side to Google’s decision to shut Google Reader. Before reader there was a healthy set of competing RSS readers. One by one these fell by the wayside because they were unable to compete with the search giant’s free service.
Google entered the space, wiped out the competition and now it is leaving the space.
- Google Reader, please don’t go — I need you to do my job (stephanielgrossmslis.me)