Two bloggers comment on RSS feeds:
RSS is no longer a key content distribution channel.
He’s right in that RSS never became a mainstream means of consumption (indeed, I’d argue that it never really was a key content distribution channel), but wrong in that, for those of us who live or die by the information we find, consume and process in various ways, it’s still a vital tool.
- Adam Tinworth.
When Google closed Google Reader there was discussion that said RSS was dead and no longer needed now that people get their feeds from social media. As Tinworth points out, there are still 15 million die-hard RSS users out there.
Social media has its uses, but with services like Twitter or Facebook, stories go whooshing by in amongst all those cat pictures and other distractions. If you want to check this morning’s technology news from New Zealand publishers, RSS is the only easy way to capture everything in one single spot. The alternative is to spend hours ploughing through multiple sites.
Long may it live.
From What’s the difference between Business Intelligence and Big Data? – Eric D. Brown.
Brown sums it up nicely:
Business Intelligence helps find answers to questions you know. Big Data helps you find the questions you don’t know you want to ask.
As he points out, there’s more to it than the soundbite and it is complicated. But if you’re looking for a useful one-liner, that’s as good as any.
A story I wrote for the NZ Herald’s Project Auckland series on the technology that’s needed to Auckland moving.
Smart tech to keep us moving – Business – NZ Herald News.
A story I wrote in 1999 for Computerworld Australia about licence agreements. I wonder if this is still a legal problem. If you know, please comment.
SYDNEY – Sites and software licensing agreements using an ‘I accept’ button may be problematic when the Electronic Transactions Bill becomes law early next year.
Phillip Argy said users could argue that the ‘I accept’ agreements are invalid if they can show they were unaware of what they accepted. The Mallesons Stephens Jacques partner and electronic law specialist was speaking to delegates at the Internet World conference in Sydney yesterday.
He said the new law will recognise a variety of electronic ‘signatures’ on agreements so long as the person making the signature is identifiable and there is an adequate way to indicate that person’s approval. “Online you have to ensure that the context in which someone agrees is appropriate.”
Argy said that in many standard online and software agreements, users are expected to read a page of conditions and then click on an ‘I accept’ button. However, in many cases user can simply “buffer the return key” and bypass agreements without acknowledging their existence or actually reading their contents. Then, if there is a dispute, they can argue they were unaware of the conditions.
He said, “The onus is on site owners and software developers to prove that their customers know that there is an agreement – they don’t have to actually read it, they just need to know it is there.”
He said that this problem can be avoided if developers ensure that the ‘I accept’ button doesn’t activate until the customer has at least scrolled down part of the conditions document.