Use said when you report someone’s words.
Newspaper and other style guides disagree over whether to use past tense (said) or present tense (says).
It doesn’t matter which. Pick one and stick with it. Although at times you may need to write someone says this now, but said something different in the past.
While you can use said even with written words – if you are quoting what someone wrote in a mail or in tweet – it is better to make it clear the person wasn’t talking at the time.
Alternative verbs are mainly pompous or value-laden. I once worked with a journalist who sprinkled his copy with words like averred or commented. Neither adds useful information. The pompous language may frighten off some readers. To me it read like something from Edwardian times.
Sewing seeds of doubt
Readers may interpret other alternatives to said as suggesting the speaker is lying, misinformed or doesn’t know what they are talking about. Think of claimed or according to.
By the same token it is perfectly OK to used claimed or according to when you want readers to understand there may be some doubt.
One alternative I allow myself is the verb ask. This only works when someone is clearly asking a question.
Fiction writer Elemore Leonard has another perspective on this. In his excellent Ten rules of writing he says:
Never use a verb other than “said” to carry dialogue.
The line of dialogue belongs to the character; the verb is the writer sticking his nose in. But said is far less intrusive than grumbled, gasped, cautioned, lied. I once noticed Mary McCarthy ending a line of dialogue with “she asseverated,” and had to stop reading to get the dictionary.
Leonard writes fast-paced fiction with terrific dialogue, if sticking with the one word is good enough for him, it is good enough for the rest of us.
You may have noticed I used says a few paragraphs ago. The present tense often works better than the past tense unless you are writing history.