There’s no figure on the size of the deal, nor are there enough details to estimate its value. As a rule of thumb, managing telephone services for 2300 staff could be worth in the region of $50 to $100 per person per month depending on use patterns.
However you cut the numbers, it’s a big deal.
From the press release:
The agreement is 2degrees’ first key contract under TaaS (Telecommunications as a Service) and involves WAN, LAN and Wi-Fi connectivity services at more than 120 MPI locations throughout New Zealand including main offices, border facilities, laboratories and fisheries offices.
2degrees will support and manage MPI’s site and user connectivity via its extensive national data network, while its national mobile network will serve the Ministry’s mobile connections. Effectively 2degrees will be responsible for connecting the 2300 strong workforce.
What the press release doesn’t say is that this is the kind of commercial deal 2degrees couldn’t win when it was a mobile-only business. It bought Snap to broaden its scope so it could offer landline and data services.
On the surface the MPI contract vindicates that strategy, although you might equally argue that the company should have stuck to its knitting offering low-cost prepay mobile plans. There are heavy management overheads operating a full-service telco. And there’s a need for significant capital expenditure. That has been a long-term struggle for 2degrees.
Last month rumours swirled Australia’s TPG Telecom was on the brink of buying 2degrees. If there was a deal on the table, it seems to have fallen through.
Price would have been the stumbling block. At the time of the Sky deal, Vodafone was valued at around $3.5 billion. So a cash buyer could expect to pay in the region of $500 million. Reports elsewhere suggest the owners wanted $900 million.
Plans to float 2degrees in Australia have also been shelved.
It’s not all over. Two months ago there were reliable stories about foreign telcos, including one from Indonesia, running a ruler over the 2degrees business. At least one other Asian company has also looked at 2degrees this year.
He runs through the sale potential of three telcos. In short:
Vodafone — possible.
Chorus — unlikely.
2degrees — “Now we’re talking”.
To date most reports name two acquisitive, fast-emerging Australian telco giants as potential buyers. Both TPG and Vocus have run the ruler over New Zealand mobile company assets in recent months.
While most stories are about TPG buying Vodafone, we can assume both companies looked at 2degrees.
It doesn’t end there. I’m told China Mobile has looked at a possible NZ acquisition. And at least one Indonesian telco has investigated the local market.
This means a Vodafone sale could be competitive.
In the NBR story Chris Keall looks at Vodafone’s numbers. He notes:
“Vodafone NZ lost $120 million last year. It blamed complications integrating TelstraClear…”
He goes on to point out the operating earnings were $438 million.
Vodafone getting the books ready
Recently Vodafone embarked on a ruthless cost-out programme. Moving from expensive office space on Fanshaw Street to the cheaper Smales Farm site is part of that. Make no mistake, many staff will choose not to move. That’ll cut costs further.
It’s possible that within a year Vodafone New Zealand could be generating an annual free cash flow that’s the thick end of a billion dollars. Free cash flow, by the way, is what buyers like Vocus and TPG often look for in an acquisition. It gives them money to carry on expanding.
Either way, Vodafone’s profitability is moving in the right direction.
While the NBR doesn’t put a price on Vodafone’s NZ business, Keall notes Spark’s $6.1 billion market cap would “be way too big for TPG to digest”.
Maybe. But the going price for a market-leading mobile phone company with 2.4 million users and $1 billion in free cash flow each year isn’t far short of Keall’s $6.1 billion.
That could well be too much for TPG’s shareholders. China Mobile could find the cash.
Spark paid $83 million for the last paired 5 MHz block of 700 MHz spectrum. At that price Vodafone is sitting on an asset of more than $2.5 billion. Spark paid a premium, not all blocks sell at such a premium. Let’s take half that price. That values Vodafone’s spectrum at about $1.2 billion.
Vodafone’s physical cellular network, with all the building and consents done is likely to be worth close to another billion dollars. Add in the goodwill, the relationships and so on. It’s clear Vodafone New Zealand has a few billion in assets. Maybe $3 billion.
Free cash flow
If Vodafone’s free cash flow hits a billion a year, then you’re looking at a likely sale price around $5 billion. Maybe more, after all this is a market leader.
Vodafone’s board in the UK would be cock-a-hoop if the company could flick the NZ operation for more than its current book value.
In comparison 2degrees has yet to break-even. The company loses money every month. Its network isn’t extensive and it owns less spectrum than Vodafone. In early May reports said the company was looking at an ASX float. Those stories put 2degrees’ value at around $800 million.
If we look at 2degree’s spectrum assets, it has about 110 Mhz. On the same basis as our earlier calculation, that is worth around $500 million. It’s complicated because some spectrum is owned by a Maori trust. The value of the network is also complicated. It involves vendor finance. And it isn’t as extensive as Vodafone’s.
2degrees has call centres, shops, a decent brand, an OK reputation and systems in place.
Looking at the assets and the company’s potential, an $800 million valuation looks reasonable.
Imagine you were a cash-rich international telco looking for a New Zealand asset. Your choices are to pay a hefty premium and buy the market leader or to pay under a billion and pick up the number three player.
Fear of missing out
Remember, there are three, maybe four, buyers looking at the market. It’s possible a buyer who misses Vodafone might still want an NZ carrier.
On the face of it Vodafone would be the smartest bet. It’s not risk-free. Spark is snapping hard at Vodafone’s heels.
Managing Director Simon Moutter has taken the fight to his competitor. Today Spark has almost as much usable spectrum as Vodafone. It has access to similar, if not better, technologies.
The recent 4.5G trial in Christchurch illustrates Spark’s capacity to compete. If a Vodafone take-over is messy, Spark will probe every weakness.
Vodafone is also under pressure from Spark’s investment in public wi-fi hotspots serving customers as much as an extra gigabyte of data a day from old telephone boxes.
2degrees more threating than you might think
If anything, the threat to Vodafone from 2degrees is more serious.
Yes, that’s right. It sounds counter-intuitive, but until now 2degrees’ biggest stumbling has been lack of investment capital. It hasn’t had the funds to maximise its opportunity.
Many 2degrees customers roam on the Vodafone network. That means the company has to pay Vodafone when its customers make calls. Guess who makes the most money when that happens? It’s not 2degrees.
And let’s not forget that 2degrees couldn’t find the $20 million or so needed to buy spectrum that other carriers value at $80 million. Nothing shouts “under capitalised” more than that decision.
A billion here, a billion there
What if a cash-rich international telco snapped up 2degrees for say, $1 billion? And then invested another billion filling in the network holes and buying spectrum — assuming there is any still available.
Let’s say the new buyer switched strategy. Rightly or wrongly 2degrees is positioned as a full-service telco. Maybe that’s not the smartest approach when you’re small and undercapitalised. Maybe New Zealand doesn’t need three full-service mobile carriers.
That is another story. For now the key point is that if Vodafone is in play, so is 2degrees. The merger and acquisition activity could come to nothing, but that’s not what people inside the business think will happen.
Blame the regulator?
Australian telecommunications analyst Paul Budde thinks 2degrees’ problems come down to New Zealand regulatory settings.
He may have a case, but he is looking at the market from a country where the government is only too keen to get its hands dirty in the telecommunications market. New Zealand’s more lassez-faire approach precludes that. Regulatory changes are unlikely with the current New Zealand government.
Let’s not forget TPG and Vocus are competitors. If one moves on a New Zealand mobile carrier, the other may feel it has to move in order not to fall too far behind.
If the stories circulating in the market have any validity, it’s likely both Vodafone and 2degrees will have new owners before the end of the year.
Two years ago Vodafone owned more mobile spectrum than any other carrier.
While it still owns the most spectrum, Vodafone’s lead is slipping. It may yet fall further.
We’re seeing a land rush as carriers prepare for the next generation of mobile data services and Spark is grabbing more territory than anyone else.
One feature of 5G mobile is the ability to aggregate spectrum in different bands. In simple terms, the more spectrum a carrier holds, the more wireless bandwidth they have at their disposal. More bandwidth can either mean faster data speeds or a higher number of simultaneous customers.
5G changes the picture
As Analysys Mason explains, 5G cellular will need new spectrum. At the moment much of the potential 5G spectrum is set aside for other uses. From a telco point of view, all existing spectrum investments could be used for 5G, that doesn’t mean they will be.
In the future the carrier with the most bandwidth will be able to dominate the market.
This explains why Spark has pushed hard to catch-up with Vodafone. Depending on how you look at the raw numbers, it may already have overtaken its rival.
For clarity, the spectrum bands currently used for cellular in New Zealand are:
850 MHz (Telecom only) – 3G
900 MHz (2degrees & Vodafone only) – 2G and 3G
1800 MHz (all operators) – 2G and 4G
2100 MHz (all operators) – 3G
In the bands currently used for cellular, the operators hold:
Vodafone: 130.4 MHz
Telecom: 110 MHz
2degrees: 99.6 MHz (some of which is owned by 2degrees’ shareholders, Trilogy Ltd and Hautaki Ltd) .
Starling went on to say:
Soon, the 700 MHz band will also be used for cellular. All three operators will own rights in this band.
The 700 MHz spectrum auction took place soon after the earlier story appeared. By the time it finished, the ratio between the three main carriers in the bands Starling names as used for cellular had changed. Spark (formerly Telecom) picked up 40 MHz, Vodafone took 30 MHz while 2degrees could only afford to buy 20 MHz.
The new holdings are:
Vodafone: 160.4 MHz
Spark: 150.0 MHz
2degrees: 119.6 MHz
Spark now has almost as much existing cellular spectrum as Vodafone, while 2degrees slipped further behind.
With cellular frequencies, lower numbers are better
On the whole lower frequency spectrum is more valuable than higher frequency spectrum.
Lower frequency signals travel further. This means carriers need to install fewer towers to cover the same number of customers. Signals find it easier to penetrate buildings and pass obstacles at lower frequencies.
In round numbers, spectrum lower than 1 GHz is prime wireless real estate. Staying with round numbers, we can assume the small edge Vodafone has over Spark in terms of absolute spectrum in the bands currently used for cellular is balanced by Spark holding more of the better frequencies.
Some animals are more equal than others
In other words, at the moment, the two companies are about equal when looking at the existing cellular bands. Meanwhile, 2degrees is behind, but not out of touch.
Given the current structure of the cellular industry, 2degrees will need a different strategy to the two big carriers.
So far we’ve only looked at the spectrum that MBIE describes as “currently used for cellular”. That’s not all the spectrum available to carriers. As Analysys Mason points out, with 5G all spectrum potentially comes in to play.
In effect Spark now has almost as much UHF spectrum as Vodafone. The two have almost three times as much spectrum as 2degrees.
A back of an envelope calculation estimates today’s UHF spectrum share as:
Vodafone: 320 MHz
Spark: 315 MHz
2degrees: 120 MHz
This is an estimate based on the Vector graph plus the extra 10 MHz Spark won in the second round of the 700 MHz auction and the 70 MHz Spark purchased from Craig Wireless.
There may be more or overlooked spectrum not included in that last list but unless the overlooked blocks are large, the important point here is that Spark has shifted the 3:2:1 ratio to something closer to 3:3:1.
Disclosure: Bill Bennett has worked as a consultant for Spark Digital.
New Zealand’s LTE mobile network faster than UK, US and Australia.
New Zealand has the world’s second fastest LTE phone downloads. Only Singapore has better mobile data speeds. Australia comes in at number eight in the list while the UK and USA are miles behind.
The statistics come from a network monitoring app called OpenSignal. The maker of OpenSingal says average LTE speeds in New Zealand are 29 Mbps. That’s a long way behind Singapore on 37 Mbps, but well in front of Australia where speeds average 24 Mbps.
OpenSignal breaks down the numbers by carrier. Vodafone has an average speed of 32 Mbps. Spark weighs in a 28 Mbps and 2degrees is close behind on 27 Mbps.
Spark, Vodafone and Chorus will pay almost NZ$44 million towards this year’s $50 million Telecommunications Development Levy.
The Telecommunications Development Levy is an extra tax paid by telecommunications companies. Each company pays a little over one percent of its revenue to subsidise rural broadband and finance other worthy but uncommercial services.
Spark is the biggest contributor. It pays almost $20 million. Vodafone pays almost $14 million and Chorus’ share is around $11 million.
The next two telecommunications companies, 2degrees and CallPlus pay around $3 million and $1.2 million. There are 13 other companies paying the tax. Between them, they pay about $2 million.
Companies have to earn at least $10 million from “telecommunications services” before paying anything.
Government set the Telecommunications Development Levyfund at NZ$50 million. Each of the contributing companies pays a proportion of the total depending on its share of all “qualifying revenue”.
Some of the money raised, NZ$2.6 million this year, pays for the Telecommunications Relay Service. This helps people with hearing problems use telephones.
The government sets a further sum aside for 111 emergency services. It spends the rest of the money on rural broadband.
A tax by any other name
Note how government charges the Telecommunications Development Levy on revenue, not profit.
That would be difficult because as a whole New Zealand’s telecommunications industry barely scrapes a profit.
Last year the five companies paying the lion’s share of the levy made a collective loss. This year the numbers are better, but not much.
Telecommunications is not a high-margin business and requires huge capital investment in infrastructure. Not least in paying the government to use the radio spectrum — which could be regarded as another form of taxation.
In practice companies pass the extra taxes on to telecommunications customers.
There’s an irony here. While telecommunications companies pay extra tax, the companies, one might argue benefit the most from a nationwide broadband network, barely pay any tax.
Google and Facebook earn a king’s ransom selling ads to New Zealanders. Because they claim these sales happen elsewhere in the world the revenue they collect is effectively tax-free.
They wouldn’t be able to earn this tax-free income if it wasn’t for the likes of Spark, Vodafone, Chorus, 2degrees or CallPlus providing the networks. They get a free ride.