Passive Optical Lan means fibre to the desktop

Chorus held a Tech-Week event introducing Passive Optical Lan technology at it’s Auckland laboratory.

Thanks to the government-sponsored UFB roll-out most New Zealand businesses are now on the fibre network. Fibre delivers gigabit internet to offices, factories and other business buildings.

It means better, more reliable communications. Done well, fibre delivers productivity gains. In business, network speed is the killer app.

Yet for many companies, fibre stops at the door. Or, more likely, a termination point somewhere in the building. From there most connections are copper.

Passive Optical Lan, or POL, is the modern way to build local area networks. POL uses fibre to move data around a building. It is, at core, a local version of the UFB network technology.

Passive is good

A group of homes or other buildings on the UFB network share a single fibre line. The single fibre is split using a device called a passive splitter. It’s called passive because there’s no switch involved. The main fibre line divides into a number of lines; one for each building.

You may hear fibre network people talk of GPON, that’s a Gigabit Passive Optical Network. A Passive Optical Lan divides fibre lines in the same way.

Passive is the important word here. In a copper network you need electrical power. That’s active; the opposite of passive. Data signals in a copper cable are electrical currents. You also need power to drive the copper switches.

Fibre data signals are light waves. Power is needed at each end of the connection. There is no need for power at each step of the journey. That means cost savings. It also means there’s no electricity warming things up, so you don’t need air conditioning. It also means there is less to break.


The most obvious benefit of moving to fibre for internal networking is that it is fast. In practice this is less important than other considerations.

In most business buildings the internal network still relies on copper, usually Ethernet cables.

That’s OK from a performance point of view. Gigabit Ethernet, even 10 GigaBit Ethernet, can move data around fast enough for every practical office application over short distances.

Moving data is harder in a large office spread over many floors or on a campus-like site. But for most office purposes copper is still fast enough for most networking. That doesn’t make it ideal.

Cost, complexity, compact

POL’s other benefits are more compelling. It is much cheaper to install and operate. At a TechWeek function held at the Chorus Lab, Peter Vandaele from Nokia said the capital expenditure for a POL is about half that for a copper network.

Underlining this point, Alan Warne, an IT project manager working for Environment Canterbury says the organisation saved more than $100,000 when it installed New Zealand’s first POL. He says: “We got a quote of $185,000 for a copper network. The fibre we used cost $82,000”.

Vandaele says it’s not just capital savings on the install. Fibre needs less physical cable and power consumption is up to 75 percent less per connection. The hardware takes up much less space, in many office buildings this means enough room for extra desks on each floor.

Impact on building design

Warne says his one regret about installing POL at Environment Canterbury is that the organisation decided to use the technology  after the building was constructed. An early decision would have meant a different, more efficient building design.

POL is popular with hotels, especially upmarket ones. Vandaele says the saved space means they can often add an extra room to each floor.

Fibre doesn’t degrade like copper. It needs less maintenance and, more important for many companies, it doesn’t require skilled technicians to reconfigure. In most cases people can plug or unplug connectors as needed.

Passive optical lan promises easy care networks

Because of lower power requirements and the elimination of constant heating and cooling, fibre networks are less prone to faults. If something does go wrong, it is far easier to find the fault.

There is also greater resilience. Warne tells of a test where he deliberately cut one incoming fibre line during a video conference call. The network switched over to another line so fast that participants were not aware of the event.

So, if POL is this good, why isn’t it everywhere? The first reason is that companies don’t upgrade networks as often as, say, servers. The technology is still relatively new. While it has many benefits, few companies are going to rip out their existing copper networks for a fibre replacement. However, when the next upgrade comes many will look at POL then.

2 thoughts on “Passive Optical Lan means fibre to the desktop

  1. *Grouped Passive….

    IMO right now fibre only makes sense for campuses or very large buildings. Basically if you need a backbone to feed the switches for your copper drops.

    That being said, I’ve heard of home builders dropping fibre on the OLE – TV Room run on the basis that it might be used in future. And certainly simply placing​ down fibre generally is very little additional cost if you’re running other cables anyway and there’s no doubt fibre is so much more expandable than Cat.

  2. Nokia says fibre is the way to go with any future builds. No-one is suggesting pulling out copper at the moment, but it isn’t worth replacing a network with more copper. The cost savings at Environment Canterbury speak for themselves.

Want to have your say on this? Over to you: